Skip to content
Use Cases

See what changes when AI meets your workflows

The average Mitori audit identifies 40–60% cost reduction opportunities — across any department, in any industry. Here's what that looks like in practice.

Featured Use Case

Accounts Receivable: from 2 hours active processing per invoice to 23 minutes

Mitori observed a 12-person AR team spending 70% of their time on manual data entry, approval chasing, and exception handling. Active processing totals ~120 min per invoice (excluding approval wait times of 2–4 hrs). The audit identified 5 of 6 core process steps as candidates for AI agent deployment.

Invoice received (email/post)

15 min

Manual data entry into ERP

20 minBottleneck

Approval routing (email chains)

2–4 hrs wait

Exception handling

45 minError-prone

Payment matching

25 min

Posting & reconciliation

15 min
6 manual steps

Team size

12

4 + 5 agents

Time / invoice

2h 20m

23 min

Annual cost

$1.08M

$420K

Annual savings

$660K

61% reduction

What your AR team looks like after the audit

Humans handle judgement and relationships. AI agents handle volume and repetition.

Before — 12 FTEs

All manual
After Mitori audit

After — 4 FTEs + 5 AI Agents

67% fewer roles
Human
AI Agent
$660Kannual savings
Verified by audit
Aggregate Projection

Total projected impact across one organisation

8634

Staff headcount

34

AI agents deployed

$4.20M

Annual savings

5 mo

Avg. payback

Illustrative projections based on published benchmarks (McKinsey, Forrester, Billtrust, ISG) adjusted for GenAI capability acceleration. Actual results vary by organisation.

Department-by-department breakdown

Top process identified: Invoice processing and reconciliation

Mitori observed 12 FTEs with an annual cost of $1,080,000. After analysis, 5 AI agents can replace 8 positions, reducing the team to 4 FTEs at $420,000/year.

Projected savings: $660K/year (61% reduction) with a 5-month payback period.

Published research shows 40–46% cost reduction in AR automation (Billtrust, HighRadius). Adjusted ×1.5 for GenAI acceleration. After-state costs include AI agent operating costs.

Top process identified: Ticket triage and L1 resolution

Mitori observed 20 FTEs with an annual cost of $1,400,000. After analysis, 7 AI agents can replace 12 positions, reducing the team to 8 FTEs at $630,000/year.

Projected savings: $770K/year (55% reduction) with a 4-month payback period.

Published research shows 30–40% cost reduction in customer service (ISG, Forrester). Adjusted ×1.5 for GenAI acceleration.

Top process identified: Vendor onboarding and PO matching

Mitori observed 10 FTEs with an annual cost of $900,000. After analysis, 4 AI agents can replace 6 positions, reducing the team to 4 FTEs at $380,000/year.

Projected savings: $520K/year (58% reduction) with a 5-month payback period.

Published research shows 40–50% efficiency gains in procurement (McKinsey, Codiste). Adjusted ×1.5 for GenAI acceleration.

Top process identified: Onboarding and compliance workflows

Mitori observed 8 FTEs with an annual cost of $720,000. After analysis, 3 AI agents can replace 5 positions, reducing the team to 3 FTEs at $320,000/year.

Projected savings: $400K/year (56% reduction) with a 6-month payback period.

Published research shows 40–50% admin workload reduction in HR (Master of Code, Forrester). Adjusted ×1.5 for GenAI acceleration.

Top process identified: CRM entry and pipeline reporting

Mitori observed 6 FTEs with an annual cost of $600,000. After analysis, 2 AI agents can replace 3 positions, reducing the team to 3 FTEs at $300,000/year.

Projected savings: $300K/year (50% reduction) with a 7-month payback period.

Published research shows 25–35% efficiency gains in sales operations (McKinsey). Adjusted ×1.6 for GenAI acceleration.

Top process identified: Contract routing and regulatory filing

Mitori observed 5 FTEs with an annual cost of $650,000. After analysis, 2 AI agents can replace 2 positions, reducing the team to 3 FTEs at $390,000/year.

Projected savings: $260K/year (40% reduction) with a 9-month payback period.

Published research shows 25–35% efficiency gains in legal operations (McKinsey). Adjusted ×1.5 for GenAI acceleration.

Top process identified: Multi-channel collections outreach and escalation

Mitori observed 10 FTEs with an annual cost of $900,000. After analysis, 5 AI agents can replace 7 positions, reducing the team to 3 FTEs at $315,000/year.

Projected savings: $585K/year (65% reduction) with a 3-month payback period.

Based on real client results: 3X collections recovery rate, 50% staff reduction achieved. Projections adjusted for GenAI voice and messaging capabilities through 2026–2028.

Top process identified: Incident management and change request routing

Mitori observed 15 FTEs with an annual cost of $1,350,000. After analysis, 6 AI agents can replace 9 positions, reducing the team to 6 FTEs at $650,000/year.

Projected savings: $700K/year (52% reduction) with a 5-month payback period.

Published research shows 35–45% efficiency gains in IT operations (McKinsey, Gartner). Adjusted ×1.5 for GenAI acceleration including AIOps and intelligent automation.

Ready to see what your audit would reveal?

Every organisation is different. Book a scoping call and we'll walk through how Mitori maps value across your specific departments.

Explore the audit